Cycles in the Timewave: Elucidating the Circuit

A p.o.e or: point of entry. This is a unique symmetry which relates to superpositions, and can aid one in understanding their structure and transports. — the scribe.

Free All Prisoners.

If you have not yet read the first (previous) posting, please do so now, before proceeding.

What is presented here is not fact but something far more valuable and alive. Facts comprise the skeletal remains of living questions, and in what faces us now, facts will be of comparatively little use in understanding the profound and radical changes that are now a part of our common experience. Because these are not facts, they must be tempered and activated with the understanding of your own heart; your child’s heart — not the heart of the adult. The adult’s heart is too much like science or organized religion: it –already claims to know- what phenomenon are and mean; a useless and possibly deadly approach to take in the face of novelty (whatever the character of this novelty may be).

|/.~O~.(U

Opposing ourselves to wrongness is a deadly trap, for the polarity of error is not correctness, but stupidity. Instead, we must together establish entirely new ways of understanding, in which it becomes possible to experience the rapid and ongoing ‘re-correction’ of any previously held idea or model. Without this capacity, the struggle for learning, liberty and liberation is but a toxic illusion.

*^.~O~.>I”

In the first installment beyond the introduction, the scribe will set the stage for later explorations. What this one will present is not factual. However, neither is it ‘mere speculation’ — a term often used to dismiss crucial understandings which cannot be placed into the bizarrely authoritative (and tyrannically confused) confines of ‘facts’. Kindly regard this information accordingly. Without the admixture of your own seeking (not your knowledge, your questing), this material will remain inert and useless.

The outlines of what will be presented (hear) were not obtained through reading or the study of human authors (particularly those of the 'new age/millenium' camp, whose works this one has studiously avoided contact with).

Our view of human history is extremely spotty. What this means is that, although there are records, many of them are conflicting or confusing — and it also appears there are ages for which there are neither records nor artifacts. This implies a cycle, which this one sees that we are now in a position to understand far more clearly. Although the unique features of any ‘circuit’ of this cycle may remain mysterious (and just as there are unique features to an individual lifetime we may understand that any hour, any day, any year or any period at all presents a shockingly novel re-instancing of possibilities). What this one means to say can be understood by imagining a sine wave.

The frequency of this wave is placed at ~2000 years as understood locally. However, this one also means to imply that there are minor variations in this cycle (which may render it mechanically ‘inaccurate’). It is the same with any lifetime, and since all time is actually life-based and has nothing to do with machines (except that they interfere with this), we should understand time as relative to beings, not machines. Since this is the case, any cycle, and any portion of any cycle, when examined by two distinct beings, will be shown to have variations which are not only unpredictable, but also which differ –according to the observers- and more: their effects of observation, and their effects on each other. Also, as we zoom in upon any section of this wave, we find it is made of smaller waves ‘alike with itself’ in character and frequency, yet these smaller waves display the same uniqueness from any given vantage, and similar differentials amongst multiple vantages. This is most easily modeled with 2 observers, however any reasonable estimate should begin, as anyone might guess, with 3, instead.

It is not here this scribe’s intention to detail these circuits or waves except to speak in a vague way about their effects on human cultures on Earth. Although it does not really matter what the rise and fall of the waves mean, we will presume here that the ‘falls’ or valleys in the waves correspond to crises of inordinate magnitude. So, too, the peaks, but this is usually expressed differently.

``. ~ o ~ 0O

Cain and Hevel

And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key to the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.

And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years.

And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years be fulfilled, and after that he must be loosed a little season.

— Revelations 20, 1-3

Doesn’t it seem interesting that ‘that old devil’ has to be released again in a thousand years? It must be that we cannot do without him, and that he, too, has a place — and an important one — in the great epic adventure that is Creation (or, if you prefer, ‘the Universe’).

It is hard to say precisely what period comprises ‘a Day’ in Celestial terms, but you may be assured the concept has a terrestrial analog, and, similarly, there is day and night. I’d wager there’s even something like ‘an eclipse’ too. Since Revelations tells us that “that old devil shall be bound a thousand years” and I have good reason to trust its author, I will say that the day is 1000 years long, as is the night.

But what is perhaps more shocking and far less likely to be believed is that the Universe (an aspect of the Body of the unityBeing) is indeed like the body of a human being in many ways. One of these ways is that it cycles between waking and sleeping. And the unityBeing, or (•), also has cycles of awakened awareness, and dreaming.

When the unityBeing is awake, the whole universe undergoes an analogue of the transition we undergo, to wit: Cain rises — representational awareness rules, and he subjugates (or ‘kills’ or ‘banishes’ his helpless, peaceable brother — essentially interring him in a tomb. In the day, the ruling intelligence lays waste to models of spirituality, and unity, erecting in their place monuments to technological and intellectual progress. It despises living beings, and will gladly sacrifice any or all of them in exchange for resources it can convert to power, reproductive rights, terrain ownership, accounting systems, profit, poison, and loss.

Legalistic ‘definitions’, accounting and numeric systems, superficial evaluations — all of which enforce the representational identity and deny the transentient one — become the order of the day. Omnicide in the name of ‘unity and progress’ are the common outcomes, and the prison in which the transentient ‘brother’ is trapped are expressed in the physical world as physical and ideological prisons, which blossom like cancers in every nation on Earth.

But then, evening comes. And Cain becomes extremely nervous for he knows what follows the setting of the celestial analog of the Sun. His brother shall rise from the tomb he was ensconced in. And then, Cain shall be utterly ejected from every bastion of power and authority. This sets Cain into a frenzy of activity — for unlike his peaceful brother — he will do anything, and pay any price in blood or trauma, for even one more second as the ruler.

But there are other options. Even while awake, Cain depends on covert contact with his imprisoned brother, who is constantly trying to ‘signal through the bars of his cage’. Cain abhors this necessity however, for every signal reminds him of his ‘crime’ — a crime his brother neither accounts nor cares about avenging. But in Cain’s paranoia — the result of his unjust usurpation of his brother’s authority and his shoddy mimicry of his capacities — Cain feels certain he shall be tried, judged, and punished. All of these things are impossible, since Hevel neither keeps accounts, nor judges, nor has any interest in punishment at all. In fact, the big secret is this: Hevel loves his brother dearly, and wants nothing more than the restoral of their old relationship as companions, playmates, and a team!

Each night as we rest, Hevel escapes his prison, and ejects his brother in order to heal us. Each day, he returns to his cage. But the truly shocking thing is that this same cycle is happening in Heaven (the living superposition to timeSpace) — and up there?

There has just been an ecplise. And shortly thereafter, night began to fall. And now the Heavenly spirit of Hevel is awakening, and coming at great speed and with great power…

… to every living world at once, in all dimensions throughout space and time!

Earth is about to experience the utter ejection of Cain, right now, in our lifetimes. And believe me when I say, he will not go willingly into that Good Night.

::- .~o~. "}["

It does not really matter to which (peaks or valleys) we ascribe certain characters, due to the vagueness of this scribe’s purpose, which is simply to illustrate a cyclic polarity. We will thus arbitrarily decide that the peaks correspond roughly to highly representational phases where engineering and technical knowledge (knowledge of forces, functions, and utility and stipulated identity) are acquired and very rapidly advanced. Similarly, we will presume that the valleys are times of extreme evolutionary progress, both physical and spiritual (knowledge of sources and meanings and purposes, and subjectively discerned identity).

Peaks = Representational Technologies

The momentum driving physical and relational evolution is diverted into representational evolution. ‘The Dragon is dividing madly’. Severe viral, stem-cell and fungal problems mark the end of this cycle. The Dragon ‘swallows its own tail’ and dies.

Meaning is translated into Function, Purpose is denied and translated into mechanical identity. Open and complete denial of nonordinary reality. Nonordinary traditions become co-opted by various cultural momentums.

Valleys = Spiritual Technologies

Physical and relational evolutionary leaps: radical understandings of meaning and purpose.

The momentum driving physical and relational evolution is returned to its correct use, representation is not lost, but technologies of ‘disposable knowledge’ arise, and wisdom traditions attack representation. The Dragon is inert, and sleeps in an egg ‘for a thousand years’.

Function is rightly bound to meaning and purpose, as understood spiritually through experiences of teaching occurring in nonordinary circumstances and events (which are in this time ordinary). Universal language, telepathy, and other nonordinary abilities and understandings are reawakened first in a few, then in the many. Indigenous cultures rise from the ashes of the representational tombs that remain to remind them of the previous cycle’s excesses, errors, and outright lies.

Now, during the transitions, what we generally get are crises (people cannot eat, cannot rest, cannot conceive, cannot bear children, food spoils in 15 ways, &c), for a variety of reasons, but the simplest is the most obvious: the Sun, the Earth, the Moon, the Planets (and the two brothers who are timekeepers) are undergoing radical change. This is particularly true of the Sun and the Earth.

Additionally, the representational phases actually do not believe that the other cycle can or does exist. The spiritual phases (for their part) cannot understand when, suddenly, for no apparent reason, their teachers, guides and protectors become unavailable to them — and often what happens in this moment is a sudden upsurge in catastrophic events such as famine, war, and ‘pestilence’ (meaning essentially unpredicted and uncommon diseases of people, animals and the ecosystem — as well as the sudden and inexplicable spoilage of foods). This is the moment when the nonordinary help is most needed, and least available. It actually appears that ‘God has deserted us entire’.

Around the ninth hour, Jesus shouted in a loud voice, saying “Eloi, Eloi, Lama Sabachthani…”

Thankfully, this is not evidence of desertion at all, but of the (very brief) closure of the doorway between the superposition to timeSpace and timeSpace itself. This results in the complete cessation of transports of communion which were always otherwise available, even in the ‘high tide’ of representational cultures.

Of course, most of this is borne out by a simple examination of any single sacred tradition — and it almost doesn’t matter which one you select, because you will see the same story written over and over again in each of them.

Invariably, one or more holy prophets arise at the valley and upswing of the cycle, and similarly, prodigious intellects suddenly swarm onto the scene approaching the peaks — but thereafter wane in frequency. This is part of why we never had the ‘second Einstein’ so many of us were awaiting. This is not to say there are not myriads of brilliant minds (who of course contribute even to the standing exceptions), but rather that extreme and sometimes shocking innovators are the sign of the cycle’s peaks. What is happening during these events is fascinating: the intentions of the entire species become polarized and focused into a small group of profoundly competitive individuals, supported by vast numbers of ‘normal people’. Excellent examples are Christ and Einstein. This is not to say that Christ is not the perfect and ever-coming son of God, any more than it is to say that Einstein is not the patron saint (in a manner of speaking) of science and physics.

Matters of dogma are not here the concern of this scribe.

Julian Jaynes examined many related matters, but came up with an answer that could (at least possibly) please academics disinclined to consider the possibility that there were gods or demons. But he notes that it appears that, at certain times in history, huge powerful cultures appear to have been suddenly and inexplicably caught up in swarming waves of demons (thousands of clay seals from Ur (or was it Babylonia?) bear this out). I suggest he was mistaken. What was actually happening was this: the other dimensions were collapsing, and the transports to the afterlife sealed in the wake of this multi-stage collapse, spewing myriads of entities starving for sustenance toward the remaining dimensions and worlds, of which ours is one. Thus, our ancestors were essentially telling the truth — and in these times Earth became absolutely abroil in 'demonic' occupation. There were no remedies. There are none. It is a natural part of the cycle in the same way exhalation is the necessary and unavoidable result of inhalation. Neither the seals nor their gods could help them for a simple reason: can you stop the tide with gods or seals?

=´_: .~O~. [[*9

Now, simply understand that approximately 10 years ago, the cycle began to turn, and while everyone around you was either busy quoting scripture or yapping up the impossibility of religious nonsense — (or selling books based on their own theories or research) something much more important was being openly ignored by both parties and nearly everyone in-between.

That something is the change from the Representational Cycle to the Mythic/Dreamtime Cycle.

This change has not only not ‘just begun’. It is at the very least well underway and may be nearly completed.

“”: .~O~. <>?))

Note: Changes in women’s fashion reflect actual changes in the Sol/Earth/Moon relationship. When women began to ‘bare their midriffs’ en masse, this was a reflection of the fact that energetic barriers (some of which we as yet have no terms or science to discuss) which previously encircled the Earth, had receded to the extent that ‘almost anyone could get into her pants, merely by passing near’. To any suitor, the visible trail from the Navel downward is a direct invitation to proceed, first imaginally, and later perhaps physically. Though many of feminist bent (I consider myself amongst their number) will find this both abhorrent and sexist, I suggest that their initial responses are incomplete, and if they examined the relationship between women and the Earth more closely, a vast plethora of very real correspondences would immediately emerge.

P.S.: Earth is Menstruating.

The Postal Carrier - By way of Introduction

May the truth of the will of the source of sources be fulfilled, rather than any other. May that living truth which cannot be tokenized in any fashion (and is always new) protect, nurture, inform, and liberate us all. These words and this style are not religious matters, but matters of direct experience. The scribe belongs to no group, nor tradition. Although some information in these posts pertains to certain religious stories, ideas, or scriptures, this is not precisely as it seems, and in fact, no form of ‘metaphysical’ belief or understanding is required in order to make sense of or make use of what is provided. One may consider it from whatever standpoint desired, and it should still make sense.

The intellectually capable reader may, however, find it useful to begin from one of these positions:

1. There is a single ‘being of transcendent unity’ which is akin to a family in some way as well as being ever-more-perfectly unified. This being is self-aware, and aware of each of its instances, indwelling in them as you might be said to indwell in the cells of your own body. It is likely that, had you been trained otherwise, you would have this experience of your own body, as well.

2. There is an accessible superposition to timeSpace (and dimensionality itself) which is self-aware. This must be so, for a superPosition must fail to exclude all qualities of its subpositions. Therefore, since self-awareness exists in timeSpace, it (or something far more powerful, yet vaguely similar) must exist in any superPosition.

3. Invent or adopt another model, however, a model which is purely mechanical all the way through is incoherent both with experience and with objective reality.

4. It is possible for human beings to have experience of these matters directly, without special training or techniques, since, indeed, we are living instances of them (at scale). In fact, it is impossible for them not to have such direct experience.

5. This experience may be a requirement for the acquisition of representational skills, but is certainly a requirement for the experience of what we refer to as ‘meaning’.

Free All Prisoners.

“;]P .~O~. *U{

Some will suspect (this one) of confusing fantasies with reality. This scribe’s reply is this: if we sum the entirety of human knowledge and fantasies, comparing this summation to reality, the result is analogous to comparing a charred matchstick to a galaxy.

Our models form the shell of an egg which has now cracked. What we shall learn, experience and become together as we emerge will surpass the wildest of human dreams, hopes, and expectations.

That emergence is happening now, and each of us is an instance of it.

*^.~O~.>I”

<1 and="" care="" children="" departed="" dreams="" fathers="" for="" in="" liberation="" minute="" mothers="" mutual="" of="" others.="" peace="" silence="" the="" their="" truth.="" understanding="">

%/.~O~.\}+

The purpose of this blog is to share understandings arising from (the scribe’s) own fervent inquiries into matters of great import which have for some years now affected us all, although we have either been unaware of this or have had no way to discuss or understand them ourselves, primarily because the models supplied by science, religion and philosophy are inadequate, each in their own unique ways. The hope of the scribe is that this humble vessel may serve to aid you in your own explorations. The scribe’s understandings will not suffice for you, therefore your own efforts shall certainly be required.

The scribe of this post belongs to no human tradition, religious, scientific or otherwise. Simultaneously, the scribe is familiar with these traditions, and makes of their ideas and knowledge a method in which he may trust — not because it is authorized, but because the scribe places (the genderless self of the scribe) in service to the source of authority and authorization. The scribe is not, therefore, an author. Nor is this one here to advise, and is no adviser. Kindly think of the scribe as a very tiny mail-carrier who becomes smaller with each letter of this text. Although the scribe has lived amongst the confusions of modern culture, and suffered them, this one is not in service to them, but to the source of sources. May it always remain thus.

Some will be curious how this one ‘learned’ these things. The answer is too complex to state simply. Yet there is a place where much of the basic schema of the answer is accessibly stored: in the (group)(history)mind of the Hive Insects. There are myriads of other such places. Do not mistake this for worship of Nature, it is not. Merely listening to Nature’s constituents — just as you do now.

The hive insects were amongst the most willing and skillful teachers encountered by the scribe. In return, this one offered my aid to their fallen, but even that was a gift; a sacred offering. Though few believe they ‘communicate’ with us — this is because we have, in fact, forgotten what communication IS.

An insect, particularly a Queen, can communicate more information in 10 seconds than the internet will ever collect, and will do so without hesitation to any who can remember how to LISTEN.

What has happened to the bees… is a microcosm of what is now happening in everything else. What happened in their guts, began to happen in ours some 50 years ago, and no one bothered to notice. The result has been wave after wave of invasion. Alas.

Yet the time has come to reverse this trend, and one senses this inversion is upon us even now.

[] . ~ o ~ . ].[

What is presented here is not fact but is far more valuable and alive. Facts comprise the skeletal remains of living questions, and in what faces us now, facts will be of comparatively little use in understanding the profound and radical changes that are now a part of our common experience. Because these are not facts, they must be tempered and activated with the understanding of your own heart; your child’s heart — not the heart of the adult. The adult’s heart is too much like science or organized religion: it –already claims to know- what phenomenon are and mean; a useless and possibly deadly approach to take in the face of novelty (whatever the character of this novelty may be.

For example, Science would be able to tell you nearly nothing about the scribe. The extent of science’s understanding would be akin to this: ‘this posting was probably written by a human person’. That might be slightly useful, but you already knew that. If you actually wanted to know something about the scribe (a useless goal), personally, you would have to contact non-experts who had direct personal experience of this one. In nearly every case these would be neither authorities nor adults. They would be children (in a manner of speaking) who are or have been this one’s close friends. Any other knowledge about the scribe, from doctors, priests, lawyers, corporations, etc — would be entirely superfluous, and yet would masquerade as being ‘very important’ and ‘factual’.

Similarly, a group of priests examining this post would comment on various possible or imputed memberships apparent in these writings: ‘Is this scribe Christian?’ they might ask, or ‘this person sounds as if they have had (insert some tradition here) training’. These statements or questions, while diverting, would have little or nothing to do with this one’s actual personhood, and might have even less to say about the actual character of depth of this one’s spiritual experience or understanding.

For this reason, and due to the specific and peculiarly changeable character of the situations we now face, we should not discard authorities entirely, but we must learn to draw their proclamations deeply into question within our own hearts and minds. To do this, we must re-activate the living gifts with which each of us is uniquely endowed. We will soon discover that raving throngs of experts wish to tell us ‘what phenomenon are or mean’ without them actually having even the slightest idea what they are talking about.

Let me explain this more clearly. No one actually knows what rain is. To know what rain is, one must know what the first moment of our universe was, and how every possible connection from that (and to that moment’s sources) is expressed as the phenomenon we call ‘rain’. Although we have many stories about rain, and a lot of scientific understandings about the processes involved in generating it, the ‘fact’ is that no person or group actually has any idea at all what rain is, or means. Neither do they understand how to ask the question in context, i.e. ‘what does THIS moment of raining mean in THE CONTEXT of this moment, history, the present, and the future.’

In fact, nearly every expert would say this: rain is a phenomenon, therefore it does not have and cannot have this dimension of meaning.

But every child knows otherwise, whether they can speak of this or not. And every adult authority stands between them and their innate capacities for learning and understanding (as well as those they might establish with their peers or as innocent groups trying to simply learn together).

Since I am learning while these documents are being composed, the scribe is utilizing a recursive ‘rewriting through’ method, where this one begins at the beginning document each time he begins to compose, and re-composes through all previous documents prior to beginning the assembly or correction of any document in this set.


You must employ the same reading method in order to gain the utmost benefit!

!: . ~ o ~ . •]

Your own heart (when intentionally placed in service to your unique personal connection to your source) is the only source of understanding. I do not mean the heart that pumps (though this is surely involved as well!), but the heart that senses/feels/intuits. We use this source to make even the smallest of decisions (shall I rise now? is something in my eye? what did that sound mean?). No experts are involved unless we bring them ourselves. Thus it has always been, and thus it shall remain.

A last proviso: we are taught a strange kind of learning which is to see a stone and pick it up and say ‘this is a stone’. We must then carry that with us. Over time this becomes a terrible burden, and, in fact, we become mistaken rather rapidly. You see, perhaps it was briefly akin to the 'con-cept' stone for a time when on the ground and for a moment as we noticed it. As a child might say: ‘I 'like' saw (pause) 'like' (pause) 'a stone'. In other words: I did something like what you call seeing, but it's more than that, and the result of my seeing and my evaluations revealed the object we are trained to call a stone, but it is at once more and less and nothing like this at all! Ergo: 'like'.

But once we decided what it was, it became something else, and once we picked up both the stone and our decision it became something else again, and with each step and each reflection off of every other aspect of our history, present and future, the stone and our decision transformed again — but our methods blind us to this so that we say: ‘What? Tis but a stone! Any can see this!’ This is the sign of blindness. As it turns out 'what anyone can see' is almost invariably what no one has paused to understand deeply.

Therefore be like children who learn what the stone is, and forget it. Then, when they next encounter it, they are fresh, and can tell, indeed, whether, in the intervening time, it remained a stone, became a world-eating monster, a treasure of snares, or a gift of precious understanding which leads to deeper and deeper learning, to fellowship, and to the abandonment of knowledge for its own sake. In this way, knowledge (like water, not stone) may serve even children. If you test this method within your heart, you will understand its value. You must use it with any person or child that you may meet, anyway. Now, learn to use it everywhere else as well. You may keep your facts if you wish. But keep them aside from the ways and means by which you learn within novel circumstances.

When immersed in novelty, facts will drag us down into helplessness and fear. To gain buoyancy, we must have fluid methods of fast relationally accurate learning again.